Nyogel Damping Grease Sample Pack Results (774VL-VH & 868L-VH)
Posted: Sat Nov 21, 2020 21:39
Recently I disassembled my Gladiator MKII to address some strange sensor issues that were popping up on my Y-axis. I believe the culprit was some excess grease that had made its way onto one of the magnets. I was successful in diagnosing (or at least solving the problem serendipitously) and put the stick back together only to discover that while I had fixed the issue, I had inadvertently wiped some of the grease off a part or two and left the stick motion inconsistent between the axes.
No problem, I figured now was a good time to look into some new greases to make the control of my joystick feel more realistic when used as a Helicopter cyclic. Anyone who has had a Helicopter lesson or even tried the Huey in DCS World knows that cyclics are extremely sensitive to motion, moreso than many other vehicle controls out there, and so the proper lubricant/damping sensation is very important. I did a bit of research on the matter and wasn't able to find much, other than a frequent suggestion for other sticks: Nyogel 767a. However the description of this product made me a bit skeptical, as most users reported a heavy damping sensation and I wasn't sure how that would fare for my realism pursuit.
Fast forward to today and I've just finished testing 6 different greases out of Nyogel's damping grease lineup and I figured that I'd post my observations/experiences here for posterity. TAI-Lubricants (their American small quantity supplier) offers a sample pack of 8 greases with varying viscosities and properties. You may have seen their comparison videos on youtube yourself ->
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFSe-9v8tuk
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59F9qUDNwnQ
What isn't mentioned in these videos or elsewhere is that the 868 series and 774 series have very different tactile sensations.
The 774 series is much like the 767a. There is some decent tack to the gel, meaning it is quite sticky and the shear resistance is high. When you get down towards the 774VL(very light), the gels seem to be intended for tiny electronics or finer gears, as there is decreasing discernable displacement resistance (cushion) between the parts and it would seem that the quality control or tolerances between said parts would need to be very fine in order to get the best use/experience from it. When testing this gel I could feel quite a bit of grinding from the plastic cams, as there was a lot of actual contact between the parts. In the opposite direction, the 774VH, while less tacky/dampening than the famed 767a gel, offered quite a bit of cushion.
The 868 series seemed more akin to an actual grease, with plenty of cushion between parts even at about the lowest viscosity (868L). It offered similar damping speeds to each of its gel counterparts, but with a different sensation. The 868 series is much smoother in resolving fine movements, and allows force in any direction with more even control than the 774. I think it is superior in my experience, as the shear resistance is quite a bit lower while still offering comparable speeds to the 774. I suspect something along this line is what was used in the original manufacture of the MKII, as it feels closer to my initial experience with the joystick.
Unfortunately in my testing of these Nyogel greases I discovered that at all but the highest levels of damping in each series, you have to fight the springs quite a bit, leaving you with much LESS control and accuracy than with the original manufacturer's grease. In other words, the 774VH and 868H offered the only usable resistance to the force of the standard MKII springs, while still falling short of the default. I think these gels and greases might be more suited to a simpler design of cams than what the MKII uses, with fewer parts in contact, or for unilateral movements like the MKII's built-in throttle or even an external one like the TWCS/Thrustmaster HOTAS. I don't think that any of the gels/greases are suitable for this joystick, let alone helicopter cyclic replication, unless you are using VERY light spring tension or maybe an extension.
Anyway I hope this information is helpful to others who may be looking into high quality alternative damping greases. I intend to test out the 767a gel next, and post my comparison results accordingly for those who may be wondering. Please note that my experience was exclusive to the Gladiator MKII joystick, so a different design may net you different requirements. I also feel that the greases may offer more success in things like rudder pedals, such as the CH Pro pedals (which are my next project!)
No problem, I figured now was a good time to look into some new greases to make the control of my joystick feel more realistic when used as a Helicopter cyclic. Anyone who has had a Helicopter lesson or even tried the Huey in DCS World knows that cyclics are extremely sensitive to motion, moreso than many other vehicle controls out there, and so the proper lubricant/damping sensation is very important. I did a bit of research on the matter and wasn't able to find much, other than a frequent suggestion for other sticks: Nyogel 767a. However the description of this product made me a bit skeptical, as most users reported a heavy damping sensation and I wasn't sure how that would fare for my realism pursuit.
Fast forward to today and I've just finished testing 6 different greases out of Nyogel's damping grease lineup and I figured that I'd post my observations/experiences here for posterity. TAI-Lubricants (their American small quantity supplier) offers a sample pack of 8 greases with varying viscosities and properties. You may have seen their comparison videos on youtube yourself ->
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFSe-9v8tuk
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59F9qUDNwnQ
What isn't mentioned in these videos or elsewhere is that the 868 series and 774 series have very different tactile sensations.
The 774 series is much like the 767a. There is some decent tack to the gel, meaning it is quite sticky and the shear resistance is high. When you get down towards the 774VL(very light), the gels seem to be intended for tiny electronics or finer gears, as there is decreasing discernable displacement resistance (cushion) between the parts and it would seem that the quality control or tolerances between said parts would need to be very fine in order to get the best use/experience from it. When testing this gel I could feel quite a bit of grinding from the plastic cams, as there was a lot of actual contact between the parts. In the opposite direction, the 774VH, while less tacky/dampening than the famed 767a gel, offered quite a bit of cushion.
The 868 series seemed more akin to an actual grease, with plenty of cushion between parts even at about the lowest viscosity (868L). It offered similar damping speeds to each of its gel counterparts, but with a different sensation. The 868 series is much smoother in resolving fine movements, and allows force in any direction with more even control than the 774. I think it is superior in my experience, as the shear resistance is quite a bit lower while still offering comparable speeds to the 774. I suspect something along this line is what was used in the original manufacture of the MKII, as it feels closer to my initial experience with the joystick.
Unfortunately in my testing of these Nyogel greases I discovered that at all but the highest levels of damping in each series, you have to fight the springs quite a bit, leaving you with much LESS control and accuracy than with the original manufacturer's grease. In other words, the 774VH and 868H offered the only usable resistance to the force of the standard MKII springs, while still falling short of the default. I think these gels and greases might be more suited to a simpler design of cams than what the MKII uses, with fewer parts in contact, or for unilateral movements like the MKII's built-in throttle or even an external one like the TWCS/Thrustmaster HOTAS. I don't think that any of the gels/greases are suitable for this joystick, let alone helicopter cyclic replication, unless you are using VERY light spring tension or maybe an extension.
Anyway I hope this information is helpful to others who may be looking into high quality alternative damping greases. I intend to test out the 767a gel next, and post my comparison results accordingly for those who may be wondering. Please note that my experience was exclusive to the Gladiator MKII joystick, so a different design may net you different requirements. I also feel that the greases may offer more success in things like rudder pedals, such as the CH Pro pedals (which are my next project!)